Post-Darwinian Scientists that reject Evolution

6/15/09
gguessman...

Now how many of the people you named were pre-Darwin?
________________________________
6/17/09
Pre-Darwin scientists

Lagomort,

Great question! The first 6 out of the 13 Creationists were pre-Darwin. The last 7 were contemporaries or post-Darwin. But just in case more post-Darwin Creationists are needed. Here's more: Agassis, Dana, Dawson, Strokes, Smyrh, Virchow, Gosse, Mendel, Fabre, Thompson, Murray, Glaisher, Fleming, von Braum, and many many more. Several web pages and books list large numbers of major scientists who were/are Creationists. See www.icr.org for a book called "Men of Science, Men of God"

Garth Guessman
_________________________________
6/17/09
Lagomort has sent you a message:
Re: Pre-Darwin scientists
Now, can you supply evidence that they did not believe in organic evolution, as well as their reasoning for their disbelief?
_________________________________
6/17/09
Science rejectors of evolution
Hi Lagomort,

Would it be possible if we could work though regular e-mail, so I can keep better track of the creationists for which you want documentation? If you don't feel comfortable with private e-mail, perhaps we can go to a public forum like the open comment area under the ropen/pterodactyl youtube video. As it stands I have no way to check which Creationists were in the list I gave you. I need some way to refer back so I don't miss one or repeat one. For now I will put the first documentation (about Fleming) on the open comment area under the video.

My e-mail address is gguessman@aol.com.

Garth Guessman
__________________________________

6/18/09
Re: Re: Pre-Darwin scientists

To Lagomort,
Famous scientists who reject organic evolution:
1st - Sir Ambrose Fleming: a founder and first President of the Evolution Protest Movement (renamed Creation Science Movement) https://www.csm.org.uk/whoweare.php.

His book, Evolution or Creation? (1938, Marshall Morgan and Scott, 114 pages, ASIN: B00089BL7Y), outlines objections to evolution.

For scientific accomplishments see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ambrose_Fleming

Garth Guessman
__________________________________
6/18/09
Re: Re: Pre-Darwin scientists
Mr. Fleming was not a biologist. Just because he was a scientist he does not get a free pass in being critical, as he made his judgments based on his religious leanings, and not on the evidence.

Again, no viable argument against organic evolution was given by the man. His arguments were based on his own misunderstandings.

If you care to give one of his arguments that you think is legitimate, I would like to hear it.
_________________________________